END OF GOVERNMENT NEW ORDERThe
success of the New Order government in implementing economic
development, should be recognized as a major achievement for the people
of Indonesia. Plus the increase in physical infrastructure infrastructure that can be enjoyed by most people of Indonesia.
However,
the success of the economy and infrastructure of the New Order is less
balanced with mental development (character building) of the executive
government (bureaucrats), security and economic actors (entrepreneurs /
conglomerate). Kalimaksnya,
in mid-1997, corruption, collusion and nepotism (KKN), which has become
a culture (the rulers, authorities and powers)
1. Causes of emergence of Reform
Many
things that were conducive to reforms on the New Order government,
mainly located in inequality in the political, economic and legal. New
Order's determination of its inception in 1966 is to implement
Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution genuine and consistent in the order
of the society, nation and state.
After
holding a stack of New Order power in controlling the government,
appears a desire to continue to maintain his power or status quo. This raises nagatif accesses, which is farther away from the initial determination of the New Order. Finally,
corruption and deviation from the values of Pancasila and provisions
contained in the 1945 Constitution, many carried out by the New Order
government.
2. Krisi Politics
Democracy is not carried out properly will cause political problems. There is a sense of popular sovereignty in the hands of a particular group, even more on hold by the authorities. In
the 1945 Constitution, Article 2 has been mentioned that "Sovereignty
is the hands of the people and carried out entirely by the Assembly". Basically
the de Jore (legal) sovereignty of the people is carried out by the
Assembly as representatives of the people, but the de facto (in fact) a
member of the Assembly is set up and engineered, so most of the members
of the Assembly were appointed by ties of kinship (nepotism) .
Things like this lead to the emergence of distrust to government, parliament, and MPR. Distrust that's caused the emergence of the reform movement. The
reform movement demanding reforms to the total in all areas, including
membership of the House of the Assembly deemed dam filled with nuances
of corruption.
The
reform movement also demanded that conducted the renewal of the five
packages of political laws is considered a source of injustice
